Changes for page LoRaWAN Communication Debug
Last modified by Edwin Chen on 2025/01/29 20:30
Change comment:
There is no comment for this version
Summary
-
Page properties (2 modified, 0 added, 0 removed)
-
Attachments (0 modified, 7 added, 0 removed)
Details
- Page properties
-
- Author
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ 1 -XWiki. Bei1 +XWiki.ting - Content
-
... ... @@ -4,9 +4,8 @@ 4 4 5 5 6 6 7 -= 1. (% style="display:none" %) (%%) OTAAJoinProcessDebug =7 += 1.Join process page check = 8 8 9 - 10 10 These pages are useful to check what is wrong on the Join process. Below shows the four steps that we can check the Join Process. 11 11 \\**If user has checked below steps and still can't solve the problem, please send us (support @ dragino.com) the sceenshots for each step to check. They include:** 12 12 ... ... @@ -44,17 +44,17 @@ 44 44 45 45 46 46 47 -(% style="color:blue" %)**3. Gateway TrafficPagein LoRaWAN Server**46 +(% style="color:blue" %)**3. Gateway Live data in LoRaWAN Server** 48 48 49 -* IftheJoin Request packetrivehegatewaytrafficinserver? If not, check the internet connection and gateway LoRaWAN serversettings.48 +* Does the gateway real-time data contain information about Join Request? If not, check the internet connection and gateway LoRaWAN server Settings. 50 50 51 -* Ifthe server send back a Join Accept for the Join Request?if not, checkifthe keysfrom the device match the keysyou put in the server, or try to choose a different server route for thisend device.50 +* Does the server send back a Join Accept for the Join Request? If not, check that the key from the device matches the key you put into the server, or try to choose a different server route for that end device. 52 52 53 53 * If the Join Accept message are in correct frequency? If you set the server to use US915 band, and your end node and gateway is EU868, you will see the Join Accept message are in US915 band so no possible to Join success. 54 54 55 55 [[image:image-20220526163633-3.png]] 56 56 57 -The Traffic for the End node in the server, use TTN as example 56 +The Traffic for the End node in the server, use TTN as example. 58 58 59 59 60 60 ... ... @@ -62,14 +62,14 @@ 62 62 63 63 * If this data page shows the Join Request message from the end node? If not, most properly you have wrong settings in the keys. Keys in the server doesn't match the keys in End Node. 64 64 65 -[[image:image-202 20526163704-4.png]]64 +[[image:image-20240123150720-1.png||height="459" width="1182"]] 66 66 67 67 The data for the end device set in server 68 68 69 69 70 -[[image:image-202 20526163732-5.png]]69 +[[image:image-20240123150943-2.png||height="556" width="1179"]] 71 71 72 -Check if OTAA Keys match the keys in device 71 +Check if OTAA Keys match the keys in device. 73 73 74 74 75 75 = 2. Notice of US915/CN470/AU915 Frequency band = ... ... @@ -76,17 +76,17 @@ 76 76 77 77 78 78 ((( 79 -If user has problem to work with lorawanserver in band US915/AU915/CN470, he can check:78 +If user has problem to work with LoRaWAN server in band US915/AU915/CN470, he can check: 80 80 ))) 81 81 82 82 * ((( 83 -What **sub-band** the server support 82 +What **sub-band** the server support? 84 84 ))) 85 85 * ((( 86 -What is the **sub-band** the gateway support 85 +What is the **sub-band** the gateway support? 87 87 ))) 88 88 * ((( 89 -What is the **sub-band** the end node is using 88 +What is the **sub-band** the end node is using? 90 90 ))) 91 91 92 92 ((( ... ... @@ -98,7 +98,7 @@ 98 98 ))) 99 99 100 100 ((( 101 -In LoRaWAN protocol, the frequency bands US915, AU915, CN470 each includes at least 72 frequencies. Many gateways support only 8 or 16 frequencies, and server might support 8 frequency only. In this case, the OTAA join time and uplink schedule is long and unpredictable while the end node is hopping in 72 frequencies, because the end node will send data in many frequency that the gateway or server doesn ,t support.100 +In LoRaWAN protocol, the frequency bands US915, AU915, CN470 each includes at least 72 frequencies. Many gateways support only 8 or 16 frequencies, and server might support 8 frequency only. In this case, the OTAA join time and uplink schedule is long and unpredictable while the end node is hopping in 72 frequencies, because the end node will send data in many frequency that the gateway or server doesn't support. 102 102 ))) 103 103 104 104 ((( ... ... @@ -106,7 +106,7 @@ 106 106 ))) 107 107 108 108 ((( 109 -Here are the fre uqency tables for these bands as reference:108 +Here are the frequency tables for these bands as reference: 110 110 ))) 111 111 112 112 [[image:image-20220526163801-6.png]] ... ... @@ -131,7 +131,7 @@ 131 131 If we look at the [[TTN network server frequency plan>>url:https://www.thethingsnetwork.org/docs/lorawan/frequency-plans.html]], we can see the US915 frequency band use the channel 8~~15.So the End Node must work at the same frequency in US915 8~~15 channels for TTN server. 132 132 ))) 133 133 134 -[[image:image-202 20526164052-9.png]]133 +[[image:image-20240123151225-3.png||height="434" width="902"]] 135 135 136 136 ((( 137 137 TTN FREQUENCY PLAN ... ... @@ -145,7 +145,7 @@ 145 145 146 146 (% style="display:none" %) (%%) 147 147 148 -= 3. Why isee data lost/unperiocially uplinkdata?Even the signal strength is good =147 += 3. Why I see data lost/ is not periodically uplink? Even the signal strength is good = 149 149 150 150 151 151 In this case, we can check if the frequency band matches in End Node, Gateway and LoRaWAN server. A typical case is using US915 in ChirpStack server as below: ... ... @@ -179,9 +179,11 @@ 179 179 180 180 ((( 181 181 To solve this, disable the Frame Counter Check will solve this issue , or reset the frame counter in the device page. 181 + 182 +[[image:image-20240123161737-4.png||height="395" width="763"]] 182 182 ))) 183 183 184 -[[image:image-202 20526164508-10.png]]185 +[[image:image-20240123161853-6.png||height="599" width="771"]] 185 185 186 186 Disable Frame Counter Check in ABP Mode 187 187 ... ... @@ -194,7 +194,7 @@ 194 194 LoRaWAN End node will open two receive windows to receive the downstream data. If the downstream packets arrive the end node at these receive windows, the end node will be able to get this packet and process it. 195 195 196 196 ((( 197 -Depends on Class A or Class C, the receive windows will be a little difference ,198 +Depends on Class A or Class C, the receive windows will be a little difference. 198 198 ))) 199 199 200 200 [[image:image-20220531161828-1.png]] ... ... @@ -214,6 +214,7 @@ 214 214 215 215 * This packet must match the DataRate of RX1(RX1DR) or RX2 (RX2DR). (% style="color:red" %)**This is the common fail point, because different lorawan server might use different RX2DR and they don't info End Node via ADR message so cause the mismatch. If this happen, user need to change the RX2DR to the right value in end node. In OTAA, LoRaWAN Server will send the RX2DR setting in Join Accept message so the end node will auto adjust. but ABP uplink doesn't support this auto change.** 216 216 218 +== == 217 217 218 218 == 5.2 See Debug Info == 219 219 ... ... @@ -227,10 +227,10 @@ 227 227 ))) 228 228 229 229 ((( 230 -Configure a down streamto the end device232 +Configure a downlink to the end device 231 231 ))) 232 232 233 -[[image:image-202 20526164623-12.png]]235 +[[image:image-20240123163307-7.png||height="330" width="1125"]] 234 234 235 235 ((( 236 236 Set a downstream in TTN and see it is sent ... ... @@ -330,7 +330,6 @@ 330 330 331 331 * End Node traffic (from server UI) to shows end node activity in server. 332 332 333 - 334 334 = 6. Downlink Issue ~-~- Packet REJECTED, unsupported frequency = 335 335 336 336 ... ... @@ -406,7 +406,7 @@ 406 406 ))) 407 407 408 408 409 -= 8. Why isee uplink 0x00 periodcally on the LHT65 v1.8 firmware =410 += 8. Why I see uplink 0x00 periodically on the LHT65 v1.8 firmware = 410 410 411 411 412 412 Since firmware v1.8, LHT65 will send MAC command to request time, in the case if DR only support max 11 bytes, this MAC command will be bundled to a separate uplink payload with 0x00. ... ... @@ -453,26 +453,25 @@ 453 453 = 10. Why i got the payload only with "0x00" or "AA~=~="? = 454 454 455 455 456 -(% style="color:blue" %)**Why thishappen:**457 +(% style="color:blue" %)**Why sensor sends 0x00?** 457 457 458 -For US915, AU915 or AS923 frequencies .It ispossible because: .459 +For US915, AU915 or AS923 frequencies, the max payload lenght is 11 bytes for DR0. Some times sensor needs to send MAC command to server, because the payload is 11 bytes, The MAC command + Payload will exceed 11 bytes and LoRaWAN server will ignore the uplink. In this case, Sensor will send two uplinks together: one uplink is the payload without MAC command, another uplink is **0x00 payload + MAC Command.** For the second uplink, in the server side, it will shows the payload is 0x00. Normally, there are several case this will happen. 459 459 460 - When using the frequency mentioned above, theserversometimes adjusts the Data Rate (DR) of the node,becausethe end node hasAdaptiveDataRate (ADR) Enabled.461 +**Possible Case 1**: 461 461 462 -1. 463 +Sensor has ADR=1 enable and sensor need to reply server MAC command (ADR request) while sensor has DR=0. 463 463 464 -When the server adjusts end node data rate to 0, the maximum payload length is 11 bytes. The server sometimes sends an ADR packet to the end node, and the node will reply to the server after receiving the ADR packet, but the number of payload bytes exceeds the limit, so it will send a normal uplink packet, and following an additional 00 data packet to handle this MAC command response. 465 465 466 -2 .466 +**Possible Case 2:** 467 467 468 -The server downlinks a calibration time package 469 -This calibration time packet will exceed the byte limit, causing its payload to become 00 468 +For the sensor which has Datalog Feature enable, the sensor will send TimeRequest MAC Command to sync the time. This Time Request will be sent once Sensor Join Network and Every 10 days. While they send such command with DR=0, sensor will send this command with 0x00 payload. 470 470 470 + 471 471 (% style="color:blue" %)**How to solve:** 472 472 473 473 Solution: 474 474 475 -~1. Use the decoder to filter out this 0x00 packet. 475 +~1. Use the decoder to filter out this 0x00 packet. (**Recommand**) 476 476 477 477 2. Data rate changed from DR3 to DR5, increasing upload byte length 478 478 AT+ADR=0 ... ... @@ -556,24 +556,24 @@ 556 556 = 13. Why it takes longer time for OTAA joined in US915/CN470/AU915 band? = 557 557 558 558 559 -In US915, AU915 or CN470 frequency band, there are 8 subbands, totally 72 channels. and LoRaWAN server normally use only one sub-band, for example Subband 2 in TTN. The gateway also configured to Subband 2 and cover eight channels in this subband. If the end node transfer data in Subband 2, it will reach to gateway and to the LoRaWAN server. If the end node transfer packets in other subbands, for example subband 1, the packet won't arrive both gateway or LoRaWAN server. 559 +In US915, AU915 or CN470 frequency band, there are 8 sub-bands, totally 72 channels. and LoRaWAN server normally use only one sub-band, for example Sub-band 2 in TTN. The gateway also configured to Sub-band 2 and cover eight channels in this sub-band. If the end node transfer data in Sub-band 2, it will reach to gateway and to the LoRaWAN server. If the end node transfer packets in other sub-bands, for example sub-band 1, the packet won't arrive both gateway or LoRaWAN server. 560 560 561 561 562 -In Dragino Sensors old version firmware (before early 2022), the subband is fixed the subband to 2 , but this cause a problem, the end node is hard to use in other subband and need program. So the new logic is as below: 562 +In Dragino Sensors old version firmware (before early 2022), the sub-band is fixed the sub-band to 2 , but this cause a problem, the end node is hard to use in other subband and need program. So the new logic is as below: 563 563 564 -We have improved this, the end node will use frequency 1 from sub-band1, then frequency 1 from sub-band2, then frequency 1 from sub-band3, etc to process the OTAA join, In this case,In this case, the end node can support LoRaWAN servers with different subbands. To make sure the end node will only transmit the proper sub-band after OTAA Joined successfully, the end node will:564 +We have improved this, the end node will use frequency 1 from sub-band1, then frequency 1 from sub-band2, then frequency 1 from sub-band3, etc to process the OTAA join, in this case, in this case, the end node can support LoRaWAN servers with different sub-bands. To make sure the end node will only transmit the proper sub-band after OTAA Joined successfully, the end node will: 565 565 566 566 * ((( 567 -Check what sub-band the LoRaWAN server ask from the OTAA Join Accept message and switch to that subband 567 +Check what sub-band the LoRaWAN server ask from the OTAA Join Accept message and switch to that sub-band. 568 568 ))) 569 569 * ((( 570 -Use the Join successful sub-band if the server doesn't include subband info in the OTAA Join Accept message ( 570 +Use the Join successful sub-band if the server doesn't include sub-band info in the OTAA Join Accept message (TTN v2 doesn't include). 571 571 ))) 572 572 573 -This change will make the activation time a little rlonger but make sure the device can be used in any subband.573 +This change will make the activation time a little longer but make sure the device can be used in any sub-band. 574 574 575 575 576 -Below is a photo to show why it takes longer time for OTAA Join. We can see in 72 channels mode, why it takes more time to join success. If users want to have faster OTAA Join success, he can change default CHE to the subband he use. 576 +Below is a photo to show why it takes longer time for OTAA Join. We can see in 72 channels mode, why it takes more time to join success. If users want to have faster OTAA Join success, he can change default CHE to the sub-band he uses. 577 577 578 578 579 579 [[image:image-20221215223215-1.png||height="584" width="1280"]]
- image-20240123150720-1.png
-
- Author
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +XWiki.ting - Size
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +119.9 KB - Content
- image-20240123150943-2.png
-
- Author
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +XWiki.ting - Size
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +161.5 KB - Content
- image-20240123151225-3.png
-
- Author
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +XWiki.ting - Size
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +136.1 KB - Content
- image-20240123161737-4.png
-
- Author
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +XWiki.ting - Size
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +83.0 KB - Content
- image-20240123161806-5.png
-
- Author
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +XWiki.ting - Size
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +71.5 KB - Content
- image-20240123161853-6.png
-
- Author
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +XWiki.ting - Size
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +60.6 KB - Content
- image-20240123163307-7.png
-
- Author
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +XWiki.ting - Size
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +123.3 KB - Content